Prep for Wednesday’s Benghazi Hearings


Liars

ALOHA, ALL!!!!!  More great info from HDR reader Carl.  The tweets are from CBS reporter Sharyl Attkisson, who deserves a Pulitzer Prize for her efforts.  But why do I think she won’t get one?  Yet Obama can win a Nobel Peace Prize.  Disgusting.

Key Information and Questions Ahead of Benghazi Hearings

Source:  Only President Could Have Made ‘Stand Down’ Call During Benghazi Attack

Investigation Could Turn on This Alone:  Left Thinks Obama Ordered Special Ops to Benghazi

Sheryl Attkisson List of Questions (So Far Stonewalled by White House)

What time was Ambassador’s Stevens’ body recovered, what are the known details surrounding his disappearance and death…
Sharyl Attkisson (@SharylAttkisson) 
January 22, 2013

…including where he/his body was taken/found/transported and by whom?
Sharyl Attkisson (@SharylAttkisson) 
January 22, 2013

Who made the decision not to convene the Counterterrorism Security Group (CSG) the night of the Benghazi attacks?
Sharyl Attkisson (@SharylAttkisson) 
January 22, 2013

We understand that convening the CSG a protocol under Presidential directive (“NSPD-46”) Is that true? If not, please explain
Sharyl Attkisson (@SharylAttkisson) 
January 22, 2013

…if so, why was the protocol not followed?
Sharyl Attkisson (@SharylAttkisson) 
January 22, 2013

Is the Administration revising the applicable Presidential directive? If so, please explain.
Sharyl Attkisson (@SharylAttkisson) 
January 22, 2013

Who is the highest-ranking official who was aware of pre-9/11 security requests from US personnel in Libya?
Sharyl Attkisson (@SharylAttkisson) 
January 22, 2013

Who is/are the official(s) responsible for removing reference to al-Qaeda from the original CIA notes?
Sharyl Attkisson (@SharylAttkisson) 
January 22, 2013

Was the President aware of Gen. Petraeus’ potential problems prior to Thurs., Nov. 8, 2012?
Sharyl Attkisson (@SharylAttkisson) 
January 22, 2013

And what was the earliest that any White House official was aware? Please provide details
Sharyl Attkisson (@SharylAttkisson) 
January 22, 2013

What is your response to the President stating that on Sept. 12, he called 9/11 a terrorist attack, in light of his CBS interview?
Sharyl Attkisson (@SharylAttkisson) 
January 22, 2013

…on that date in which he answered that it was too early to know whether it was a terrorist attack?
Sharyl Attkisson (@SharylAttkisson) 
January 22, 2013

And Does this mean that the Administration would have used them if available?
Sharyl Attkisson (@SharylAttkisson) 
January 22, 2013

Is anyone being held accountable for having no resources close enough to reach this high-threat area within 8+ hours on Sept. 11?
Sharyl Attkisson (@SharylAttkisson) 
January 22, 2013

…and has the Administration taken steps to have resources available sooner in case of emergency in the future?
Sharyl Attkisson (@SharylAttkisson) 
January 22, 2013

A Benghazi victim’s family member stated that Mrs. Clinton told him she would find and arrest whoever made the anti-Islam video…
Sharyl Attkisson (@SharylAttkisson) 
January 22, 2013

…Is this accurate? If so, what was Mrs. Clinton’s understanding at the time of what would be the grounds for arrest?
Sharyl Attkisson (@SharylAttkisson) 
January 22, 2013

The Administration is reported to have asked that the anti-Islamist YouTube video initially blamed in Benghazi be removed from YouTube
Sharyl Attkisson (@SharylAttkisson) 
January 22, 2013

…If true, what is the Administration’s view regarding other videos or future material that it may wish were not published, but are legal?
Sharyl Attkisson (@SharylAttkisson) 
January 22, 2013

What is the Administration’s criteria in general for requesting removal of a YouTube or other Internet video?
Sharyl Attkisson (@SharylAttkisson) 
January 22, 2013

Attkisson reminds us that the White House evidently has no intention of following through on its promises of transparency:

After repeated contacts, a White House official has indicated they will not be answering these questions.
Sharyl Attkisson (@SharylAttkisson) 
January 22, 2013

Additionally, months ago, CBS News FOI’d Benghazi info from State Dept, CIA, FBI and Defense Dept. None has been provided.
Sharyl Attkisson (@SharylAttkisson) 
January 22, 2013

Additionally, CBS News has repeatedly requested the promised surveillance video from Benghazi but it has not been provided.
Sharyl Attkisson (@SharylAttkisson) 
January 22, 2013

We’ve also asked for any White House photos taken that night, as well as an accounting of Pres. Obama’s decisions and actions.
Sharyl Attkisson (@SharylAttkisson) 
January 22, 2013

None has been provided.
Sharyl Attkisson (@SharylAttkisson) 
January 22, 2013

@RobbieCooper No. they say they will have “no further comment.”
Sharyl Attkisson (@SharylAttkisson) 
January 22, 2013

One of our recent reports: White House declines to release images from Benghazi night: cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-5…
Sharyl Attkisson (@SharylAttkisson) 
January 22, 2013

At a press conference 11/14/12, President Obama stated that his Admin. has provided all info regarding “what happened in Benghazi.”
Sharyl Attkisson (@SharylAttkisson) 
January 22, 2013

Just disgraceful.

I just want to get and share facts others don’t want you to have. What you do with them, how you think, is your own business.—
Sharyl Attkisson (@SharylAttkisson) 
January 22, 2013

GOD BLESS AMERICA – PASS THIS ON!!!!

Tags: , , , , , ,

About giliar

An American patriot who has gone rogue - I will remember in November!

6 responses to “Prep for Wednesday’s Benghazi Hearings”

  1. Tom says :

    Listening to the hearing now. The thing that keeps occurring to me is that we need the ability to destroy large numbers of people indiscriminately in faraway lands, so that foreign governments will be terrified to allow anyone to do this kind of thing. Maybe if we had missiles and bombers with intercontinental range, and missiles launched from submarines. These missiles and planes could carry warheads or bombs which explode with a force of hundreds of thousands, maybe even millions, of tons of TNT. Perhaps these bombs could produce some sort of poison which falls out on a population.

    Having such weapons, and using them on enemies on a regular basis, would prevent such events as Benghazi.

    What? Oh, we have that sort of ordnance?! Oh, then the only possible reason Benghazi could have happened is…

    THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ARE SO WIMPY THAT THEY ARE A DANGER TO THE COUNTRY!

    • giliar says :

      The leaders are so wimpy they are a danger to the country.

      • Tom says :

        The leaders are elected by the people. The people are responsible. The Founders did not want a democracy. They believed only an elite should be allowed to vote. They were proven right on that point.

  2. NEO says :

    I see the Loons are already spinning but, if it gets any news time, this is going to be bad for O, and the more protracted it is, like Watergate, the worse it will be. I think they would be very wise to simply cooperate but, they won’t.

    They will however, shoot themselves in the foot, or maybe a bit higher and more on the centerline, well, we can hope 🙂

    Pass the popcorn.

%d bloggers like this: