HDR 166: The “Spooky Dude” Soros Agenda


ALOHA, ALL!! Never heard of Agenda 21?  Why am I not surprised.  Alert HDR reader George gave me a heads-up about this Soros plan to be implemented by the U.N.  (yep…whenever I hear either of those names red flags fly!)  Agenda 21 is defined by the United Nations as a “comprehensive plan for action to be taken globally, nationally, and locally by organizations of the United Nations system, governments and major groups in every area in which humans impact the environment.”  Apparently Glen Beck devoted a show to this recently (I’m on the road again and missed it.)  Beck sarcastically observed that the scheme “doesn’t get spooky until Section 1” when it outlines a plan for social and economic dimensions, i.e. social justice, which focuses on the redistribution of wealth (socialism), changing consumption patterns, changed population, and sustainable settling.  Be alert and aware, HDR readers!  Under the guise of environmentalism and social justice, our freedom is being taken away.  Read this for more (if you dare):    Glenn Beck Warns Audience About UN’s Agenda 21

Is this the type of healthcare system we want?  In Britain, the breast cancer patients ‘too old’ to save – Common American Journal  “Elderly women are being denied life-saving breast cancer surgery that is routinely given to younger patients, alarming research reveals. Some doctors look at a patient’s age in their notes – and decide on a treatment plan before they have even met them, experts warn.”  Sure sounds like a “death panel” to me.

Golf made news this weekend.  Obama, Boehner Play Golf – WSJ.com   No scores given….but hubby says  Barry is a hacker.  Wanna bet if he had done better than Boehner that we’d know about it?  Then there’s this:    So “under God” was omitted twice – TWICE!  Not intentional?  Sure.

I’ve got nothin’ to say here:  Obamacare Waivers Climb to Nearly 1,400 | Breaking news and opinion on The Blaze

Excellent analysis of Barry’s anti-Israel agenda.  Articles: Barack O’Bully Wants to End Israel  “Barack Hussein Obama is therefore a practical racist — he can proclaim all the lovely sentiments he wants to, finely tuned to whichever audience he wants to sucker, but his stated, practical goal is to shrink Israel into the tiniest and least defensible borders possible. It’s like telling America to go back to the original thirteen colonies.”

Barry’s so brilliant he ignores his lawyers.  Obama Overruled Two Top Lawyers on Libya – Common American Journal  “We don’t need Congressional approval because this is not technically a hostile action (because we don’t have ground troops in Libya). Tonight the NYT has a major bombshell: Two top lawyers — Jeh C. Johnson, the Pentagon general counsel, and Caroline D. Krass, acting head of the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel — told The White House otherwise.”  Oh yeah…it’s a “kinetic military action.”  That’s not considered “hostile”?

Holy Moley!  Now Barry’s Chief of Staff throws up his hands:  White House’s Daley seeks balance in outreach meeting with manufacturers  “Daley said he did not have many good answers, appearing to throw up his hands in frustration at what he called “bureaucratic stuff that’s hard to defend. Sometimes you can’t defend the indefensible,” he said.  IS IT 2012 YET?????????

You mean we can eat corn now?  Ethanolics Anonymous | FrontPage Magazine  “The Senate voted to repeal ethanol tax credits in a bipartisan 73-27 vote. The measure is expected to save the federal government $31 billion over the next five years, money that will be applied to deficit reduction.”

Final Thought:  “Any of the people on this stage would be a better president than President Obama.” –Mitt Romney during GOP debate.  I agree – Keep that in mind, regardless of who the GOP nominee is!!!!!

GOD BLESS AMERICA – PASS THIS ON – REMEMBER IN 2012!!

Advertisements

Tags: , , , ,

About giliar

An American patriot who has gone rogue - I will remember in November!

3 responses to “HDR 166: The “Spooky Dude” Soros Agenda”

  1. Lee says :

    ”Any of the people on this stage would be a better president than President Obama.” Uhhh…

    1. Ron Paul: At least Obama kills his co-religionist sheethead cousins, rather than cry and mourn when bin Laden got nailed. I’d consider voting for Obama if he pledges to at least continue some “overseas contingency operations.”

    2. Herman Cain: At least Obama is half-White and had some governmental qualifications when first elected, rather than all-Black and barely as qualified as the finance major who delivers my Dominos. I’d almost certainly sit that Presidential election out and focus on Congress.

    Now, to be fair, at least Paul is pro-gun (though so is Congress, so that might be meaningless), and Cain is… Well, Cain may technically be on the right side of the issue, but he’s also an Affirmative Action opponent who would probably want firepower between the good guys and bad guys equalized.

    Anyone who knows me knows I’m no purist. But I am also one who looks at the big picture, long-term, and at second and third order of effect of actions. Supporting Paul officially yields American world hegemony to our enemies, and supporting Cain hands the American liberal/Left the ultimate ideological victory. Opposing Paul MIGHT keep America near the lead in the world, and sitting out an Obama-Cain race at least sends a message that some of us on the Right won’t yield to the Leftist PC Identity politics that allows Cain to even remotely be taken seriously as a Presidential candidate.

    In truth, of course, neither of those has any chance against Obama. For “Ron Paul Freedom Report” to have a chance, there would have to be an uprising of White nationalism far beyond that possible for a party taking Herman Cain seriously, and one anti-American far beyond that possible for a party that reelected Bush-Cheney). And Cain… Cain would drive away the Black vote (those few Blacks inclined against Obama will resent and reject the pandering of nominating an Uncle Tom), the self-respecting White vote (imagine the lily-White family watching the Presidential debate–kinda like Christians watching an Obama-Jindal debate), and the “I look at qualifications” vote (“Fed banker turned pizza maker? HA!”).

    There is literally no scenario short of total violent social disorder by which either of those could win. The others might win with only limited violence.

    • giliar says :

      Lee – somehow I knew you’d respond to this. And all points you make are valid. But frankly, there is no way that Cain or Paul will be the nominee. And we will NOT survive another four years of Barry. At least Cain has biz experience and Paul is Fiscal conservative. And they would both appoint cabinets that would get this country back on track. Perry 2012!!!! (any day now…)

      • Lee says :

        If by some supernatural intervention (notice I didn’t say, “divine”), Cain became President in 2012, it would merely confirm the Leftist victory–the tearing down of the traditional leadership class of America and the rule of Political Correctness–“See how far Left we’ve pulled the country. The Right has to go PC Affirmative Action just to get a President elected.” By 2016, the idea of a conservative White President would be as unthinkable as NBC broadcasting the entire Pledge of Allegiance.

        Paul’s cabinet will be irrelevant as he yields the world to our enemies. And by the time he and his morons figure out that the by-then-nuked State of Israel and/or the by-then-vanquished (for better or worse) Federal Reserve wasn’t the center of a gimongous world-ruling conspiracy, it will be too late. America will be a subjugated country. The only question is about which world power will be the one to hold hegemony.

        As for “fiscal conservatism,” what good is that when the sovereignty, hegemony, and autonomy facilitating your precious economy is lost? What we need is the kind of “conservatism” that kills lots and lots and lots of people we don’t like and respects our national heritage. Doing this right can and will take care of our fiscal and economic problems. It’s like the argument for buying an expensive Glock* as opposed to saving the money or buying a less costly pistol: “It pays for itself the first time it’s used.”

        *NOTE: Not a Glock fan, but it’s the one with the reputation. Give me a good Kel-Tec or Smith and Wesson anyday.

%d bloggers like this: